Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:16:42.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shifting the Status Quo: Constitutional Reforms in Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Claudio Fuentes
Claudio Fuentes*
Affiliation:
Universidad Diego Portales and International Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Studies. claudiofuentes.saavedra@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article outlines the factors that explain changes in the rules of the game in Chile after the restoration of democracy in 1990. It looks particularly at the reasons why the right-wing parties—strong defenders of the constitution imposed by General Augusto Pinochet in 1980—accepted reforms that eliminated many of what the literature has termed authoritarian enclaves. The article explains this shift by observing significant changes in the political context that, in turn, affected the priorities of veto players. In this context, short-term strategic calculations by the right-wing parties, aiming to achieve a new balance of power less detrimental to their interests, opened a window of opportunity that led to congressional approval of important reforms. Particular institutional features of the Chilean political system—party discipline and a balance of power in favor of the executive—also helped the political actors to reach agreement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 99 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alemán, Eduardo, and Pachón, Mónica. 2008. Las comisiones de conciliación en los procesos legislativos de Chile y Colombia. Política y gobierno 15, 1: 3–34. www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/pyg/v15n1/v15n1a1.pdf Google Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Navia, Patricio. 2009. Legislative Success in Strong Presidential Systems: Institutional Influences and the Fate of Government Bills in Chile. Journal of Legislative Studies 15, 4: 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Saiegh, Sebastián. 2007. Legislative Preferences, Political Parties, and Coalition Unity in Chile. Comparative Politics 39, 3: 253–72.Google Scholar
Arenas, Alberto. 2010. Historia de la reforma previsional chilena. Una experiencia exitosa de política pública en democracia. OIT Publicaciones 1, 1: 1–139. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---americas/---ro-lima/---sro-santiago/documents/publication/wcms_178562.pdf Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa, and Carey, John. 1999. Presidential Agenda Control and Spending Policy: Lessons from General Pinochet's Constitution. American Journal of Political Science 43, 1: 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biblioteca del Congresso Nacional de Chile (BCN). n.d. Bill submitted to the National Congress by Congress representatives and the Executive. http://www.senado.cl/appsenado/templates/tramitacion/index.php Google Scholar
Biblioteca del Congresso Nacional de Chile (BCN). 2005. Historia de la ley 20,050 que introduce diversas modificaciones a la Constitución política de la República. Santiago: BCN.Google Scholar
Boeninger, Edgardo. 2008. Relaciones entre partidos, gobierno y parlamento en el sistema presidencial chileno. Reforma de los partidos políticos en Chile, ed. Fontaine, Arturo et al. Santiago: PNUD/CEP/Libertad y Desarrollo/ProyectAmérica/CIEPLAN. 191–219.Google Scholar
Calvo, Esteban. 2007. The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Law Making in Highly Disciplined Legislatures. British Journal of Political Science 37: 263–80.Google Scholar
Carey, John. 2002. Parties, Coalitions, and the Chilean Congress in the 1990s. In Morgenstern and Nacif 2002. 222–53.Google Scholar
Carey, John. 2003. Accountability and Legislative Voting in Latin America. Comparative Politics 35, 2: 191–211.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP-Chile). 2014. Catálogo de encuestas. Santiago. http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/lang_1/encuestasCEP.htm. Accessed June 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Przeworski, Adam, and Saiegh, Sebastián M.. 2004. Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 34, 4: 565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Morgenstern, Scott. 2001. Latin America's Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents. Comparative Politics 33, 2: 171–89.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio. 2006. La transición de los militares. Santiago: LOM.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio. 2011. A Matter of the Few: Dynamics of Constitutional Change in Chile, 1990–2010. Texas Law Review 89, 7: 1741–75.Google Scholar
Fundación de Ayuda Social de las Iglesias Católicas (FASIC). 2003. Derechos humanos en Chile. Resumen mensual. http://www.fasic.org/bol/bol03/bol0306.htm. Accessed June 11, 2014.Google Scholar
García, Gonzalo, 2010. Legal adviser to the interior minister 2004–5. Author interview. Santiago, March 26.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Godoy, Oscar. 2003. Parlamento, presidencialismo y democracia protegida. Revista de Ciencia Política 23, 2: 7–42.Google Scholar
Insulza, José Miguel. 2011. Former Minister of Interior. Author interview. Washington, DC, May 23.Google Scholar
Lagos, Ricardo. 2000. Discurso presidencial ante el Congreso de la Nación. Santiago: Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
Lagos, Ricardo. 2011. Former President of the Republic of Chile. Author interview. Santiago, June 1.Google Scholar
Londregan, John. 2002. Appointment, Re-election, and Autonomy in the Senate of Chile. In Morgenstern and Nacif 2002. 341–76.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 2000. Statement by Pablo Longueira (Udi) and Alberto Cardemil (Rn) in Tesis de Tribunales es Ficción. May 11: C2.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 2005. Senado: General Pinochet tenía al menos 125 cuentas. March 15. www.emol.com/noticias/nacional/2005/03/15/176114/senado-pinochet-tenia-al-menos-125-cuentas-en-eeuu.html. Accessed June 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. 2002. Towards a Model of Latin American Legislatures. In Morgenstern and Nacif 2002. 1–19.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott, and Nacif, Benito, eds. 2002. Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
La Nación (Santiago). 2005. Pinochet evadió 10 mil millones de pesos. March 15. www.lanacion.cl/noticias/pais/pinochet-evadio-10-mil-millones-de-pesos/2005-03-14/192807.html. Accessed June 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel. 2011. Shifting Constitutional Designs in Latin America: a Two-Level Explanation. Texas Law Review 89, 7: 1777–1805.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel. 2012. Toward a Theory of Formal Constitutional Change: Mechanisms of Constitutional Adaptation in Latin America. In New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices, ed. Nolte, Detlef and Shilling-Vacaflor, Almut. Farnham: Ashgate. 51–72.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel. 2013. Making Constitutions: Presidents, Parties, and Institutional Choice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolte, Detlef. 2006. El presidencialismo chileno después de 1989: lecturas divergentes. In Chile. Política y modernización democrática, ed. Alcántara, Manuel and Ruiz Rodríguez, Leticia. Barcelona: Bellaterra. 129–63.Google Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian. 2010. Active Players or Rubber Stamps? An Evaluation of the Policymaking Role of Latin American Legislatures. In How Democracy Works: Political Institutions, Actors, and Arenas in Latin American Policymaking, ed. Scartascini, Carlos, Stein, Ernesto, and Tommasi, Mariano. Washington, DC/Cambridge: Inter-American Development Bank/DRCLAS Harvard University.Google Scholar
Servicio Electoral de Chile. n.d. Electoral results of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate, 1990–2013. www.servel.cl Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 1997. Executive-Legislative Relations in Post-Pinochet Chile: a Preliminary Assessment. In Mainwaring and Shugart 1997. 321–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Post-Authoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2001. Chile: las relaciones entre el poder ejecutivo y el poder legislativo después de Pinochet. In Tipos de presidencialismo y coaliciones políticas en América Latina, ed. Lanzaro, Jorge. Buenos Aires: CLACSO. 203–50.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2002. Exaggerated Presidentialism and Moderate Presidents: Executive-Legislative Relations in Chile. In Morgenstern and Nacif 2002. 79–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Tercera (Santiago). 2000. Alianza apoya a Pinochet. August 10.Google Scholar
Terra online (Santiago). 2003. Ex general reconoce violaciones a los derechos humanos en Chile. May 30. http://noticias.terra.com/noticias/ex_jefe_naval_reconoce_violaciones_a_derechos_humanos_en_chile/act155000. Accessed June 11, 2014.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George, and Alemán, Eduardo. 2005. Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America. World Politics 57, 3: 396–420.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George, and Money, Jeannette. 1997. Bicameralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toro, Sergio. 2007. Conducta legislativa ante las iniciativas del ejecutivo: unidad de los bloques políticos en Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política 27, 2: 23–41.Google Scholar
Toro, Sergio, Acevedo, Carolina, and Matamala, Kimberling. 2010. Quebrando paradigmas en contextos presidencialistas: un examen sobre la capacidad legislativa en Chile. RIEL (Belo Horizonte) 1, 1: 102–10.Google Scholar
Uhr, John. 2006. Bicameralism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, ed. Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah, and Rokman, Bert. New York: Oxford University Press. 474–94.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric, and Zittel, Thomas. 2006. Comparative Legislative Behavior. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, ed. Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah, and Rokman, Bert. New York: Oxford University Press. 455–73.Google Scholar
Visconti, Giancarlo. 2011. Comportamiento diacrónico del congreso en Chile. ¿Crecimiento o estancamiento de su influencia? Revista de Ciencia Política 31, 1: 91–115.Google Scholar